Sunday, February 24, 2008

El Grito de Baire

Today marks the 113th anniversary of the "Grito de Baire" (Battle Cry of Baire), the start of Martí's Revolution which culminated, after nearly a half-century of armed struggle, in Cuba's independence. Those 50 years (1850-1898) were the most heroic in our country's history, with 300,000 of our countrymen perishing on the battlefield and another 300,000 (mostly women and children) in Spanish concentration camps. This out of a population which struggled to rise above 3 million in the 19th century. The population of the Thirteen Colonies at the time of the American Revolution was also approximately 3 million. Washington's soldiers sustained a total of 4000 casualties in the whole course of the American Revolution. Something to remember when the "pressure-cooker" theorists cast aspersions on Cuban heroism or contrast what we have sacrificed to obtain our freedom to the price which Americans have paid to maintain theirs.

The difference between that glorious epoch and today is that Cuba was not then an impermeable island fortress; for Spanish oppression, although terrible, was not systematic and even Cuban slaves enjoyed more rights then than do Cuban citizens today. U.S. Neutrality laws, which exist to preserve tyrannic but stable regimes in power, were an impediment then as now to Cuban freedom, but the U.S. had not entered yet into an international agreement to become the guarantor of tyranny on the island as it would in 1962. Even if U.S. presidents betrayed the rebels' plans to the Spanish, seized their expeditions, confiscated their weapons and imprisoned their leaders while they waited for the ripe apple to fall into America's lap, the people of the United States, whose sympathies were always with the Cubans, refused to assist their government in prosecuting those earlier freedom fighters. Thousands of indictments were obtained against the Cuban patriots but not one single conviction was ever secured from an American jury.

With the unremitting enmity of successive U.S. administrations, but with the good-will of the American people and the so-called "yellow press," Cubans had already won the war on the ground and were in effective control of 90 percent of the island's territory when the U.S., using the fortuitous explosion of the U.S.S. Maine as a pretext, invaded Cuba to seize the ripe apple at the last moment from Spain and to deny the rebels their just victory. For 50 years the U.S. refused to throw a lifeline to the Cuban rebels as France and even Spain had done for them in 1776, and when Cubans finally obtained alone what they might have won 50 or 30 years earlier with U.S. assistance, the Americans swooped down to secure "peace and order" on the island. This insignificant if calamitous episode within Cuba's War of Independence is known as the "Spanish-American War" (American arrogance going so far as to ignore the participation of the main actors). Americans also once called it the "Splendid Little War" because it cost them less than 400 casualties (most of these from chronic diarrhea). Then came the Treaty of Paris, the U.S. occupation of the island, the Platt Amendment and the seizure of Guantánamo Bay. (Do the French still have their naval base at Chesapeake Bay?).

Even after Cuba became a republic under American tutelage in 1902, Cubans never ceased their struggle to realize completely the dream of José Marti, Antonio Maceo and all Cuban patriots who preceeded and followed them: a free, independent, sovereign and democratic republic. In 1933, Cubans finally secured through another revolution the abrogation of the Platt Amendment and the nightmare of 1898 (except for Guantánamo) seemed finally to have been overcome.

Or so it seemed. But some nightmares have a tendency to reassert themselves, with different demons and horrors. We can never really put history behind us.

A Brief History of the Cuban Republic (1902-1958)

The History of The Cuban Republic, Part II (1940-1952)

10 comments:

Charlie Bravo said...

Some nightmares are recurrent, Manuel.
Such as this nightmare -the one that has lasted fifty years- with Valeriano Weyler reincarnated as a bearded devil. Actually, if one compared both of them one would find that Valeriano Weyler was honorable, compared to Fidel Castro, that is.

Anonymous said...

How serious is President Bush about this spreading-democracy business? the answer appears to be: not serious at all.

Bush's Cuba policy, which is based on the philosophy of interest-group conservatism.

Bush makes harder the job of democrats, both Cuban and American, by giving Castro so much fuel for anti-American propaganda.

It's easy to be for democracy when there's no price. The test for Bush is whether he's willing to promote human rights when there's a trade-off with other foreign-policy goals or his own political interests. In Cuba, he's failing it.

Anonymous said...

What still remains unclear for the time being though is whether President Bush will be willing to change U.S.’ policy regarding Cuba before his presidency ends, or will this be the job of the next president to arrive at the White House.

Manuel A.Tellechea said...

Anonymous:

Bush's implementation of Clinton's "Wet Foot/Dry Foot" policy for his two terms as president shows how little he values Cuban freedom and how much he values the status quo.

Anonymous said...

Oh, by the way,Very good article, I completely agree with most of what you are saying, ...

Manuel A.Tellechea said...

charlie:

Compared to Castro the Devil himself is honorable.

Ms Calabaza said...

Thanks for this history lesson. Excellent, as always.

Anonymous said...

Manuel:


Unfortunately this inhumane and misguided policy has been followed to date by the Bush administration.

Vana said...

Seems we are stil fighting for our very own lives, the struggle for Cuba's indepedence and freedom still goes on, but now we must fight the enemy from within, ah it just never ends, why is it denied us? that is the one hundred thousand dollar question.

Anonymous said...

Where is Part 3 of your articles? Has it already been posted?