Sunday, December 16, 2007

FLASH!!! Stuck on the Palmetto Is Dead

November 19, 2005 — December 16, 2007

In an unsigned final post, Rick has closed Stuck on the Palmetto in order to protect his career and future. Certainly he cannot be faulted for it. As we have pointed out repeatedly, he was in an untenable position. His blog had become a liability to him. He could save it or himself. So he killed the thing he loved. What else could he do? SotP was a log of his work, or, rather, of his dereliction of duty. Carefully noted, on every post, was the day and time it was written. This constituted an irrefutable self-indictment, prima facie evidence of his betrayal of a public trust. He has silenced and erased his blog before his malfeasance became public knowledge and he had to face the consequences. It may be too late already. Contrary to Rick's expectations, however, his drastic action in closing his blog will call further attention to it and to him and may actually hasten his exposure.

We are sorry for the readers of SotP, and, especially, Rick's stoic defenders who now have nothing to defend and nowhere to defend it. Alex is also a casualty of Rick's implosion of his blog. Of course it was always Rick's blog, not Alex's. Perhaps Alex will create his own blog now where he can decide when and under what conditions it will shut down. It appears from his silence that Alex had no real imput in this decision.

Babaloo to Its Readers: Shut Up!

"The most widely read blog I write for, Babalú, moderates comments and our readership has grown dramatically in spite of that (emphasis mine). That's because people come to read what the contributors write not necessarily what the readers write. — Henry Gómez, Herald Watch, December 16, 2007


For a blog with 2.3 million visitors (not "readers"), Babalú doesn't elicit many comments. In fact, posts with "0" comments are the norm rather than the exception. Why is that? The reason, of course, is Henry and Val's attitude towards Babalú's readers, which Henry considers unnecessary. Worse than unnecessary: readers are not "people" if they happen to write. If they are so convinced that their readers' imput matters not at all or is incidental to Babalú's success, why not just make it a closed blog (which in effect it is already). Babalú's deletions, anathemas and bannings, its obsessive need to control and tailor the Comments section so that it is no more than an extension, or echo, of its editors' musings, has indeed muted its readership, as Val & Henry intended it should do. Now Henry advises The Miami Herald to do the same by instituting preemptive censorship, otherwise known as moderation. Of course, no one has the right to "moderate" anybody else's opinion. All the great social upheavals in history were caused by people trying to "moderate" other people's opinions, whether about religion, politics or science. Galileo was "moderated" by the Pope. St. Thomas More was "moderated" by Henry VIII. "Moderation" is just a euphemism for silencing one's opponents because one cannot or will not answer their objections. But removing the opinion (or the one who holds it) is not the same thing as removing the objection, but for frightened men who know that they do not have reason on their side it is the only course open to them.


POSTSCRIPT:

Val Prieto Visits

Vana said:

Another example of Val's personality, he's not backing the Dolphins anymore because in his words they suck, he will now back the Jaguars because they are playing better, what a washy, washy man, all the markings of a turncoat, and a traitor.
12/16/2007 4:56 PM

Manuel A.Tellechea said...

Vana:

That is a profound observation. A man who abandons his team because it has fallen on hard times and embraces another more successful because he wants to be on the winning side, a man who has no allegiance but to success, is a dangerous man for our country's future.
12/16/2007 7:09 PM

Manuel A.Tellechea said...

Vana:

The Dolphins won today for the first time since December 10, 2006. All that they needed was for Val to renounce his allegiance to them. Kind of makes you think, doesn't it?
12/16/2007 8:23 PM

Vana said...

Does it make me think? deeply trust me, I cannot stand people, let alone men, who are not true to their word, I don't trust people like that, and I don't respect them.

I'm a San Francisco 49er fan, yes they are sucking, (but not as bad the Dolphins)..lol..I don't care! I will be their fan come hell or high water, until I die.

Ain't that something Manuel yes the Dolphins won today, good for them, I guess Val is as we say in Cuban parlance, a sack of salt, poor, poor Jaguars.
12/16/2007 11:39 PM

Val Prieto said...

Que clases de comebolas. Vana, you wouldnt know a post published in sarcasm if it was spoon fed to you with alphabet soup.

And Manuel, if anyone knows anything about abandoning teams, its definitely you. ñangara.
12/17/2007 11:34 AM

Manuel A.Tellechea said...

Val:

Was I ever a part of your "team?" No, I don't think so. I never belonged to the Bitongo League of Latter-Day Annexationists of which you are president and founder.

Glad to hear that you are now sending remittances to Cuban dissidents like the "ñangaras" that you were always accusing of perpetuating Castro in power because they would not let their parents starve.

I don't have more time for you today. But I will return to you. You can be sure of that.
12/17/2007 11:55 AM

Fort Lauderdale Officer Fired for Playing Bagpipes on Taxpayer's Dime

Those who have suggested that Rick overreacted to Bob Norman's insinuations do not understand the seriousness of the predicament in which he finds himself. The fact that this predicament is entirely of his own making, that he could have avoided it by showing more prevision, or even defused it by his silence, does not make his present circumstances more tenable. What he should have done is now a moot question. What matters now is what he should do to survive its inevitable effects. Early retirement, if possible, or resignation, if unavoidable, though it may cost him a few bucks, is his best option. It is certainly preferable to the alternative, which could end up costing him his pension and thousands in restitution: not to mention the public scandal he would be at the center of, which for such a lover of anonymity as Rick might be worse than any other punishment (though there might be others more dire as well).

There is a precedent that should be all the admonishment that Rick needs to transition into an early retirement, where he would be able to blog to his heart's content without endangering his own well-being or the safety of those whom he has sworn to protect. I am sure that Rick considers the diffusion of his eclectic opinions to be a public service, but until blogging becomes a job classification at the department and he is appointed head of its blogging division, it is in Rick's interest to perform his duties in accordance with the rules, regulations (and, yes, laws) which currently govern the department. One thing is certain: Rick must decide between his job and his hobby. There can be no "Rick the Cop" blog. He was right about that from the beginning.

Here is the cautionary tale of what happened to a police officer who tried to combine his job with his "bliss." Hopefully, he still has the bagpipes, but would he want to play them anymore?

Fort Lauderdale officer who practiced bagpipes on duty resigns to avoid firing

By Brittany Wallman
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
Posted June 1 2007

FORT LAUDERDALE · A police officer with a history of disciplinary cases, including for practicing the bagpipes when he should have been on patrol, has resigned rather than be fired.

Officer Keith J. Kowalski quit after 23 years on the force, after Chief Bruce Roberts told him in writing he was suspended without pay and then would be dismissed for not doing his job, according to police investigative records. He was suspended April 27 and his dismissal would have been effective May 25.

LocalLinks

Police spokesman Sgt. Frank Sousa said Kowalski's May 8 resignation was accepted "in bad standing," and the status was reported to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, in case Kowalski applies for police work elsewhere.

Kowalski, 49, has repeatedly been disciplined for neglecting his duties and was issued a final warning by Roberts five years ago, according to records.

Still, he kept his job despite a scathing disciplinary report in 2005, when he was suspended 16 days for not helping an elderly woman who had been hit by two vehicles and lay dying on the roadway.

"His decision-making is questionable and poses a danger to himself as well as other officers and the public he serves," police Maj. Mary Negrey wrote in a memo at the time.

Kowalski could not be reached for comment. Union officials said they had no comment because Kowalski resigned.

In 2001, Kowalski was suspended three days after the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported he repeatedly played the bagpipes at a fire station and lifted weights there when he was supposed to be working.

In another case, in 2002, he was close enough to a double-shooting to hear the gunshots, officials said, but didn't respond to the scene. Instead, he went to talk to a union representative about another discipline case in which he was accused of not responding to a dispatch call. He was suspended 15 days and issued a final warning.

"Your actions displayed a total disregard for the safety of the residents of our community and the members of this department," Roberts wrote in a letter to Kowalski at the time.

In 2003, a TV news cameraman videotaped him kneeing a shackled, handcuffed suspect in the side. Some in the public called for his firing, but he was exonerated after a lengthy investigation.
In the latest incidents that culminated in his recommended dismissal, according to the investigative file, Kowalski didn't respond to two silent distress alarms on different dates in fall 2006, both times while he was on duty and not involved with another call. Kowalski was at home when one of the alarm calls came in, and he then drove past the location without stopping, police officials said.

Kowalski told his superiors he didn't hear either broadcast, an explanation they found unacceptable.

Investigators also found that Kowalski, assigned to patrol the beach area, spent a lot of time at home, according to police records.

Investigators used vehicle locator devices to examine Kowalski's habits on 49 workdays in 2006 and found he went home 54 times in that period for an average of 35 minutes, one time for an hour and a half.

He told investigators he went home to eat, but he also took daily meal breaks at the police station, according to a memo from Internal Affairs Capt. Rick Maglione.

He was also found to have been untruthful in his sworn testimony about his visits home, according to Internal Affairs documents. And in a subsequent investigation in April, Kowalski was found to have neglected his duties when he didn't respond to a pedestrian hit by a vehicle two blocks away from his location. Kowalski said he was using the bathroom.

"Your conduct demonstrated a flagrant disregard for department rules and regulations, showed a pattern of poor judgment and violated the basic trust placed in you as a police officer," Roberts wrote in the termination letter.

Saturday, December 15, 2007

Scotland the Brave

Coming on Monday: the story of a 23-year veteran of the Fort Lauderdale Police Department who was fired in 2006 for playing his bagpipes at work when he should have been on patrol.

Stopped on the Palmetto: Ruminations on Rick

The curious are coming here in the droves from Critical Miami and the Daily Pulp to learn more about Rick's downfall. Their curiosity is understandable. This is an unfinished story and not until the innuendos metamorphose into facts will the curiosity abate and this matter be put to rest. I will not be the grandmaster of Rick's inquisition, although I understand that others are at work on an exposé that will explain Rick's panic at the thought that his cover might be blown. And, truly, he has every reason to panic. Those who believe that this was an overreaction on his part are wrong.

I have taken little notice of Rick in these precincts except as a perpetual irritant. Yet these post are not without interest since they reveal facets of his personality which are now more easily understood in the light of recent revelations about his employment and extra-curricular activities.

I believe that our enemies are as important in defining us as our friends, and I am proud to call Rick an enemy. I sincerely hope that he weathers this storm if only so I may continue to use him as the paradigm of the "Ugly American," a role he was born to play.

Stuck on the Palmetto's Rick is Deleting Posts and Cannibalizing His Readers (11/02/07)

Rick the Prick Visits (09/16/07)

No Cuban Exile Has Ever Burnt an American Flag (07/04/07)

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Notable & Unprophetic: One of Us Was Leaving, Anyway

"You're losing steam, Manny. Slowly but surely. And I think you know it... I give you until April of 2008... although, knowing you, you'll probably hang around just to spite me. However, all is not lost. You can always come back to SotP. Not." Rick (formerly of SotP), RCAB comment, October 21, 2007

Far Away and Long Ago at SotP

Roger said...
Wow.
Rick, you have reached a new low.
I really can't wait until Alex gets his own blog.
1/2/07 10:56 PM

Alex said...
Ha! Espera sentado (wait seated). [Don't hold your breath!].
1/3/07 9:34 AM

With Bagpipes: Ricky, We Hardly Knew Ye (And What We Knew We Didn't Like)

At year's end it is customary to look back one last time at the parade of humanity, both great and small, remembered or nearly forgotten, who died over the course of the year having enjoyed at least 15 minutes of fame over the course of their lives. I prefer to recall, instead, two blogs which were once very important to me (as was I to their success) which imploded this year through the ill-considered actions of their respective blogmasters. I mean, of course, Miami's Cuban Connection and Stuck on the Palmetto. I devoted hundreds of hours to commenting on them and became a fixture on both. The first is now completely dead and the other in extremis.

On Miami's Cuban Connection, I (or anyone else) could take command because Oscar Corral largely ignored his blog, which was thrust on him by The Miami Herald in token of his being a token. It was only at the end, when Corral instituted moderation (or preemptive censorship) in the wake of the public scandals that beset him, professional and personal, that I finally left. So did everybody else.

I next took residence at Stuck on the Palmetto, where other MCC alumni had migrated. In the beginning I was welcomed because my presence attracted a great deal of traffic and resulted in threads that were more interesting than the original posts. I soon became the main attraction on SotP and even had my own Greek chorus which praised every word I wrote. This was the "Golden Age" of SotP, recalled fondly by all. Never did its stats soar before or since to the levels achieved when I was commenting more than Rick and Alex were posting. It was then that Rick called me "SotP's favorite, the beloved Manuel A. Tellechea." But at some point Rick (and Alex, too) began to wonder whose blog it really was, with every commenter wanting to engage me while largely ignoring them. It was then that both Rick and Alex started attacking me and calling me a "squatter" on their blog. Indeed, at one point, they didn't do anything but attack me, and always, of course, got the worse of the argument, which only made them angrier and more insufferably petulant. This, I suspected then, was a gimmick to keep me swinging at their pitches and slamming homerun after homerun in their ballpark. Eventually, I grew tired of this game and left them to their own resources. Even after I was gone, I continued to be the "third wheel" without which their juggernaut became a go-cart. Rick, in particular, couldn't decide whether he should hate me for staying or hate me for leaving, and decided after much deliberation to do both. Even months after I had left SotP, my name continued to be invoked, as in this exchange from May 23, 2007. You don't have to be Freud to detect what lies beneath their scorn:

Anonymous said...
[T]his blog has jumped the shark without Tellechea around.
5/23/07 6:06 PM

Rick said...
Funny A. #1, without Tellechea around, I see it as quality comments rather than quantity. Plus, SotP is no longer a sounding board for his anti-American BS. The stats say the same thing.
5/23/07 6:38 PM

Anonymous said...
Yea, I know, Rick... I was sorta kidding. But I have to admit, I used to check the comments primarily to read what he would write.
5/23/07 6:45 PM

Rick said...
Way too much noise. Not any substance. I'm glad he's effin gone..
5/23/07 6:50 PM

nonee moose said...
Careful, he's like Beetlejuice. Say his name three times and...
5/23/07 7:38 PM

Alex said...
Is it a coincidence that a post about garbage reminded you of him, Anonymous?
5/23/07 11:15 PM

Yes, Rick and Alex are Nature's gentlemen; but no matter their provocations, or the number of times that they invoked my name, I was gone for good and nothing could compel me to return. Rick would ocassionally make cameo appearances at RCAB to vent his old rage, and occasionally I would take note of Rick's chronic Cuban-American bashing. Alex and I also had certain interactions here which were more cordial than my exchanges with Rick, because, after all, Alex and I share at least one thing in common, whereas Rick and I share nothing at all. Rick's attacks on Babalú amused me to no end, though I never regarded him as an ally in this struggle. Rick hated Babalú for the wrong reasons and I for the right ones. Besides, I have never subscribed to the syllogism that the enemy of your enemy is your friend. The enemy of your enemy could very well have killed your mother. It is common beliefs and not common enmities which are the foundation for a successful alliance, and in the flame war between Babalú and SotP, I declared neutrality — a pox on both their houses.

Many who know of my association with SotP in the past have wondered why I haven't commented thus far on the recent unmasking of Rick. It is simply because I could always see through his mask. I once compared Rick to Ignatius Reilly, the inofficious office boy in John Kennedy Toole's A Confederacy of Dunces. Ignatius had his own agenda at work and didn't care what his boss wanted him to do. He brazenly ignored his orders and conspired to turn the other employees against him. He alienated all the company's clients, sabotaged orders and limited his administrative duties to emptying out file cabinets. His goal, in short, was to eliminate all work. This left him free to engage in other more artistic activities which were more suitable to his valve. Ignatius just missed the computer age, but were he alive today and not in a mental ward (if there are still such things), he would certainly be blogging his worldview. Exactly as Rick does (or did): day in and day out. And, of course, on his boss's dime. That is exactly what I suggested Rick did at work nearly a year ago. Of course, Rick deleted the post (he could do that on his own blog but not on somebody else's). His reaction to my analogy left no doubt in my mind that I had touched the rawest nerve in his body. I did not explore the matter any further. I didn't have to.

Rick never made me the recipient of any confidence; but he apparently did unbosom himself to The Pulp's Bob Norman, who, in essence, suggested to him last week what I had suggested to Rick a year ago. With this important difference: Rick knew that Bob knew. Fearing that Bob would expose him because he had indulged in some vulgar sophomoric humor about prison rape (the kind of humor that appeals to those who use rape as a means to control the prison population), Rick in effect engaged in what amounts to preemptive outing. His decision to quit blogging because of Bob's admonition, which amounted to no more than the proverbial warning that "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones," left no doubt that Bob had implied no more than the truth: Rick was a law enforcement officer and hence a public employee, who was not authorized to emit private opinions on official matters much less do so while he should have been engaged in official business. It turns out that the company's dime was really the taxpayer's dime. At best, this is dereliction of duty and at worse official malfeasance. The tragedy for Rick is that there is a public log of his activity (or inactivity) for the entire duration of his blogging career which existed concurrently with his other renumerative employment.

Friends and enemies alike have both been having a holiday excoriating the caustic blogger on The Daily Pulp, Critical Miami and SotP itself for everything from blogging behind a mask (which he always did) to reacting histerically to the least insinuation about his identity. Val, Henry and George have all had their say, and were every bit as petty as one would expect them to be and as surely Rick himself would have been in their place. Still, his so-called "defenders" have done him more harm than even his detractors by pretending to justify what even Rick is too prudent to justify. I exempt his blogging partner Alex, whose gift for human sympathy does not astonish me, since I am acquainted with another case where his intervention practically saved the life of a man known to all of us here. I respect loyalty even when misplaced. Rick always attacked others from behind a curtain and when that curtain was ruffled his feathers were too. I do not see that that makes him a fit object of sympathy, but friendship must answer to other claims.

I suppose that I, too, could derive some vicarious satisfaction from Rick's downfall (or, rather, his self-implosion); but I will not commit Alesh's alleged "sin" of piling on. Although I know Rick's real identity and Alex's too, I will respect their "necessity" for anonymity as I always have. However, I believe that now that Rick has made this a public issue it will be impossible for Rick or Alex to long preserve their anonymity. A secret is a vacuum and Nature abhors a vacuum.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Meditations of Hamlet Prieto

"I suppose I could state my support for this blogger [from Cuba] and this new [Cuban tv] defector right now, but unfortunately the doubts would still be there. The unavoidable and inescapable skepticism would stick in my craw. Blister my being with doubt. Put "Am I doing the right thing?" on replay in my mind.

"And I suppose I could use liberal amounts of mental Listerine to wash that bad taste away and open up the old heart and say "Blogger, defector, come on in, make yourselves at home." I suppose I could do my best to ignore the taste of doubt.

"But I dont want to be disingenuous, and youre not really being a friend without there being a mutual trust. And yes, doubt tastes like shit and it makes me feel a little rotten inside, but its better to have a little rotten feeling with a true heart and the bad taste of doubt, than a shattered heart of broken trust."
— Val Prieto, Babalú, November 12, 2007


"Stick in my craw?"

"Blister my being?"

"Mental Listerine?"

I think I like "blister my being" best. Although "Mental Listerine" is certainly memorable and it is rare nowadays to see "stick in my craw" outside of Uncle Remus. "Craw," by the way, is the stomach of a lower animal.

I don't normally link to Babalú anymore; but this is a rare treat that must not be missed.

http://www.babalublog.com/archives/006790.html

A "Critique" that Requires Your Attention

If everything had gone as planned, October 14th would be celebrated today as the beginning of Cuba's first War of Independence. It is unlikely that the uprising would be known as the "Grito de Yara," and Francisco Vicente Aguilera, not Carlos Manuel de Céspedes, would be the Father of Our Country. But nothing went as planned. Spanish authorities learned beforehand of the uprising and cabled the local authorities to arrest its leaders. The telegram was intercepted by Cespedes' cousin, the town telegrapher, who delivered it to Carlos Manuel. Céspedes moved the date of the uprising to October 10th and launched the revolution at his own plantation with the symbolic act of freeing his slaves. Cubans understood, even if the Americans never did, that you can't fight for your freedom while denying it to others. It was not possible to inform Aguilera, the island's richest planter who had been chosen to lead the Revolution, of the change in plans. His reaction? Not only unconditional support, but Aguilera even agreed to serve as Cespedes' vice-president. This was the greatest act of abnegation in Cuban history, and if all the civil and military authorities had followed Aguilera's example, the monumental hecatomb of the Ten Years' War would have been crowned with victory. Instead, in the middle of the war, Céspedes was deposed and the Revolution deprived of the unity that alone could guarantee victory. The War ended in a truce in 1878, which at least obtained the freedom of the slaves who had fought for independence. The war would be resumed 17 years later, in 1895, by José Martí, who mended all the fences and united all the wills, and achieved the miracle of unity among Cubans in our definitive struggle for independence. The objective was achieved even if the victory was co-opted by the Americans who had been waiting 75 years for the apple to fall. Our wars of independence hold many useful lessons for Cubans both on the island and in exile. In his excellent "Critique" of recent events in Cuba, Charlie Bravo of Killcastro distills all these lessons as they apply directly to the dissident movement in Cuba today. His "Critique" is a primer for civil disobedience in Cuba, indeed, for any concerted action, whether civil or not. It should not seem odd that the lessons of our wars of independence should be applicable to this peaceful contest (peaceful at least on the side of the dissidents). But success or failure in either case depends on the same factors. Resistance to Castro will prosper or perish in accordance with how faithfully it adheres to the strategies outlined by Charlie Bravo in his critique, which we urge you to read and ponder.

http://killkasstro.blogspot.com/

Notable & Optimistic: BUCL's "Fine Work" Foments Protests in Cuba

"By the way, is the regime acknowledging BUCL's fine work when it says 'websites especially designed to undermine the foundations of our society' [fueled the protests]?" — Gusano, Babalú, December 12, 2007.

No. BUCL's "fine work" has nothing to do with it. The regime may be acknowledging, however, Babalú and the other anti-Castro blogs.

The Spain of the Catalan Ladies Is Martí's Spain

We were surprised when Babalú reported about the 10 Catalan women, officials in the regional government, who joined the "Ladies in White" in protesting the plight of Cuban political prisoners and demanding the return of democracy to Cuba. Since the inception of BUCL's Campaign Against Spanish "Explosion" (they meant "exploitation"), Spaniards have been portrayed on Babalú in only one color — black, which was all that was needed since Babalú transformed itself into the last redoubt of the "Black Legend" in non-leftist circles. They must have been surprised to no end when Hugo Chávez and Daniel Ortega began sputtering the same anti-Spanish propaganda at the Ibero-American Summit. Chávez, Ortega, Prieto & Gómez (sounds like a law firm that would really screw you) mistake Spanish corporations for the Spanish people. This is a grave mistake since Spaniards identify even less with their capitalists than Americans do with theirs. As for Zapatero's Socialist government, it is as unpopular in Spain as George Bush is here. The fact that there is a Socialist government in Spain is largely due to George Bush, whose mercenary wars of aggression proved as unpopular in Spain as in the U.S. Hapless Aznar supported Bush although he was up for re-election and Bush was not and sustained the defeat that would have been dealt Bush if he had to face the electorate across the morass that he has created in Afghanistan and Iraq. On the positive side, Zapatero's tenure is coming to an end and it is highly unlikely that he will be returned to office. He feels his vulnerability and confronted Hugo Chávez to increase his appeal among moderate voters, but his history is too well known for him to reinvent himself as a centrist. It will be interesting to see if Babalú's assault on the Spanish people will continue after the Socialists are banished from office. Is their hatred for the motherland so great that political parties and even contrasting policies towards Communist Cuba have no effect on their ingrained hispanophobia? We will see soon.

We had expected that the solidarity shown by the Catalan women would at least resonate with Babalu's readers, but such does not appear to be the case. The "Comments" section is full of the usual Spanish-bashing. Conspicious among the comments is one by Profesor Antonio de la Cova, patriot and historian, whom we introduced to Val Prieto two years ago in the hope that he could supply the historical perspective that was so wanting in Babalú. This Professor de la Cova has done for the most part. But he faltered and badly on this occasion. He admonished Val, "Don't expect any solidarity from the Spanish Socialist government. Spain has never acknowledged and refuses to apologize for their reconcentrado policy of 1896-97 that exterminated 170,000 Cubans (10% of the population) in 18 months." I have myself on more than one occasion (here and on Babalú) commented on the fact that the first concentration camps were established in Cuba by Valeriano "Butcher" Weyler, the greatest evil that ever befell Cuba before Fidel. This is not something, however, that the Spanish Socialists need to apologize for since they were the only party in Spain that not only denounced the camps but supported Cuban independence. Their leader then, Pi y Margall, whom Marti called an "Apostle," was the idol of the Cuban rebels who after independence named a street in Havana in his honor. The architects of Spain's reconcentrado policy were Spanish Conservatives led by Prime Minister Cánovas del Castillo, who in consequence was assassinated by an Italian anarchist who originally wanted to kill the boy-king Alfonso XIII or the Queen Regent but whom the great Puerto Rican patriot Ramón Emeterio Betances, Delegate of the Cuban Revolutionary Party in Europe, convinced to kill Cánovas instead. In the span of 100 years, the Socialists and the Conservatives have switched places in Spain in respect to Cuba: it is now the Conservatives who favor freedom for Cubans and the Socialists who are in complicity with the forces of reaction in Cuba. Of course, we would not expect Val to be familiar with any of this (he doesn't even know that the Cuban flag has 5 stripes instead of 13), but we did expect Professor de la Cova, who is, to place the blame for Spain's genocide in Cuba where the blame rightly belongs. Let's, by all means, demand an apology from Spain for the reconcentrado policy when the Conservatives are again in power and see what happens. The apology would ennoble them but would not alter history. It would still be wrong to hold modern Spaniards responsible for the crimes committed by political leaders who are long dead and unmourned. There should certainly be no bar sinister attached to nations because of "blood guilt." When Spain commemorated the centenary of its defeat in 1898, the most traumatic event in its history, it did not honor Cánovas del Castillo or the other fanatics who pledged to fight to the last peseta and the last soldier to keep Cuba a Spanish colony (even if Spanish honor was sacrificed too). Instead, Spain celebrated the life of the man who liberated Cubans from Spanish despotism and Spaniards from its ignominy as well. Democratic Spain has embraced José Martí (as earlier it did Simón Bolívar) as the highest expression of the Spanish spirit in the 19th century. This Spain, the Spain of the Catalan ladies, is Martí's Spain, which he acclaimed in Versos sencillos as "Franco, fiero, fiel, sin saña" (Frank, fierce, faithful, free of viciousness).

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Will Cuba Lose Its Canadian Sex Tourists to Kenya?

According to a Reuters story linked below, sexagenarian British ladies are flocking to Kenya to indulge their intergenerational sexual fantasies with young Masai warriors just as their husbands have done in time immemorial, and what happens in the Commonwealth stays in the Commonwealth. Canadian and Australian sex tourists would doubtless be more at home in Kenya than Cuba and should consider following their English cousins there. I suppose that at some time the ex-colonials will rebel and hang them all by your nether parts, but until that happens they can at least have the assurance that the G-2 isn't following them around and filming them for future blackmail.

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN2638979720071126?sp=true

Val the Abolitionist vs. Henry the Slaver

Babalú is not the old Babalú anymore. In any case, it is not consistently the old Babulú, not that consistency was ever its strong point. This is evident in the rift that has developed between Val Prieto and Henry Gómez over the smuggling of refugees.

As readers of this blog know (see links below), Henry has a full-blown fixation with exposing and prosecuting smugglers who rescue Castro's captives and bring them to freedom. He has admitted to contacting MSM journalists in the past to encourage them to cover this story. He doesn't believe that Cubans who are brought here by smugglers are real "refugees." He questions their "amateur" status and wants them excluded from the "benefits" of the "Wet Foot/Dry Foot" policy. They can be harrassed, capsized and drowned like those who take to sea on improvised rafts, but should not be afforded asylum if they actually manage to evade the U.S. Coast Guard. As for the smugglers, who run the 21st century's equivalent of the Underground Railroad, Henry wants them to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law just as white southerners, in their day, clamored for the blood of the abolitionists.

In a post this morning, appropriately entitled "Finger Pointing," Val takes to task the "MSM concubines" for the sins of Henry Gomez. Specifically, he quotes an Associated Press story which blames Cuban exiles for financing the smuggling of Cuban refugees through Mexico's Yucatán Peninsula. The article also blames the U.S. policy of granting Cubans "automatic asylum" for fomenting the "illegal trade." And who is the source for this information? No, not Henry Gómez (this time), but Eduardo Medina Mora, the Mexican Attorney General. No words in any language signify corruption as do these three words: "Mexican Attorney General." It is the ne plus ultra of cynicism that Mexican politicians, whose epic raids over 80 years on the national wealth have driven tens of millions of their countrymen across the Rio Grande in search of a better life, actually have the nerve to complain because thousands of Cuban refugees use their territory as a conduit to asylum in the U.S.? If it were up to them, they would drive the entire Mexican populace across the border, leaving just enough workers to harvest the petro-dollars which should have made Mexico this hemisphere's wealthiest country, but which, instead, has made its presidents the world's richest oligarchs.

Val is right to rail against such hypocrisy. He should, however, have focused his ire on the Mexican politicos, not the Associated Press, which is merely doing their bidding as Henry wishes it would do his in the same cause. The greatest enemy of Cuban freedom among the "fraternal" Latin-American countries over the last 50 years has been the Mexican government. Call it revanchism by proxy. Too pusillaneous to confront the U.S. themselves, because that is where their ill-gotten wealth resides and where they hope some day to join it, they derive a vicarious satisfaction from Castro's tirades against the country that underwrites their predations. Since 1959, they have paid him billions in protection money, not, of course, so he would protect them from the U.S., but so that Castro would stay out of Mexico.

Henry Gomez, like the Mexico's Attorney General, blames Cuban exiles for financing the smugglers and the U.S. for enabling the "illegal trade" by granting "automatic asylum" to those whom they transport to freedom. Val now sees it another way: "See, it's either US policy's fault or, of course, the whipping-boy Cuban-American's fault that Cubans are being smuggled into the states via Mexico. It can't possibly be because the castro regime systematically violates Cuban's human rights, or because of the system of apartheid in Cuba, or because Cubans are basically slaves to the state in their own country, or because the castro regime prefers to have the Cuban family separated..."

At moments like this I feel that my head and the wall will eventually reach a happy accommodation.

Yes, it is Castro who is to blame. Castro and only Castro. Val has seen the light at last.

Will Henry?

Decide for yourself from his past fulminations on the subject:

One Man's Obsession: The Smugglers Who Risk All to Free Castro's Slaves
Angels Who Smuggle Men to Freedom
Alfonso Chardy is the New Oscar Corral
Fred Thompson: Cuban "Immigrants" Are Suitcase Bombers
Insanity, Homoeroticism and Xenophobia on "The Babalú [Faux] Radio Hour"
You Cannot Love Cuba and Hate Cubans
The Truth In Season


POSTSCRIPT:

Fantomas said...
deja eso... hay muchas noticias buenas... no te desvies
12/12/2007 4:04 AM

Manuel A.Tellechea said...

fantomas:

The good news around here is that Val Prieto, who, like you, is apparently subject to "kinder and gentler" spells, is no longer trying to cook Cubans in a pressure cooker, calling on them to shed rivers of blood, and even has good words to say about Spaniards (Catalans at least). Progress is being made. As for Henry, he is a lost cause.
12/12/2007 7:28 AM

Monday, December 10, 2007

Notable & Late in Coming: Henry Gómez Learns the History of Man

"It's as if we live in some bizarro world where the evil are praised and rewarded for their evil." — Henry Gómez, commenting on the crackdown on human rights activists by the Cuban regime, Babalú blog, December 10, 2007

No, Henry, it would be a much better world if everybody were a little bit more "bizarro." Bizarro in Spanish is a compliment, which means dashing and fearless. It would be correct, for example, to refer to the bizarro general Antonio Maceo; but wholly inaccurate to say that Fidel Castro was bizarro even one day of his life. If it is bizarre that you mean — and we could not imagine that you could mean anything else — the word is extraño. And, yes, it is a strange, strange world that we live in, and Cubans are at the epicenter of that strangeness.

Saturday, December 8, 2007

Blogs Sobre Cuba (300 Links to Cuban Blogs)

We are pleased to add a new link to our "Fraternal Blogroll." It is Blogs Sobre Cuba, which has so far assembled links to 300 Cuban-themed blogs. It grows by a few more blogs every day and we should not be surprised if it eventually reached into the thousands. Right now it is the most comprehensive list yet compiled and you are encouraged to add to it by making suggestions in the Comments Section. The compiler does not categorize or make distinctions about the blogs. You will find there the whole political spectrum in more shades than you could ever imagine. You are free, of course, to visit or not visit any of the blogs. As a reader of this blog, you already are in the habit of thinking for yourself.

The link to Blogs Sobre Cuba will be found at the bottom of this page. But because we know that you are especially anxious to visit it, here's a shortcut:

http://www.blogssobrecuba.blogspot.com/